tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post3282222250080766345..comments2024-03-25T11:12:05.603+08:00Comments on 亂博: 地產黨無間道亂博http://www.blogger.com/profile/16107064923161771003noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-246917147761302802012-06-30T08:53:11.087+08:002012-06-30T08:53:11.087+08:00其實花棚真係好小野,以前僭建落又好,佢後來加建又好,事實上梁己經承認左僭建個花棚,何必追究係咪以前巳...其實花棚真係好小野,以前僭建落又好,佢後來加建又好,事實上梁己經承認左僭建個花棚,何必追究係咪以前巳經有,來証實講大話,根本多餘,事實係講呢個大話都多餘,因為講完呢個大話,結論都一樣,就係佢僭建左個花棚,而且巳經承認左。講呢個大話的利益是什麼?得到的利益同損失根本吾對稱,根本無需要!無分析能力的人才會聽佢地嗡!亂博https://www.blogger.com/profile/16107064923161771003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-75396920467422967092012-06-30T00:56:05.627+08:002012-06-30T00:56:05.627+08:00我以前屋企都種花,因爲有一盆爬墻杜鵑花,所以搭了一個花棚。經過今次我先知原來我都僭建。所以我好同情梁...我以前屋企都種花,因爲有一盆爬墻杜鵑花,所以搭了一個花棚。經過今次我先知原來我都僭建。所以我好同情梁生,也很驚嘆犯民上綱上綫的能力。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-20649116083817913512012-06-28T07:50:05.550+08:002012-06-28T07:50:05.550+08:00其實大家無非"以彼之道,還施彼身"而已.梁氏以僭建引發的誠信問題打得對手大敗,今...其實大家無非"以彼之道,還施彼身"而已.梁氏以僭建引發的誠信問題打得對手大敗,今又以梁氏犯了相同的錯而步步進逼,但某人的僭建可能牽涉偽造文件和串謀欺騙的相關條例,而梁氏看似並無和某些條例嚴重抵觸,此其兩人僭建的主分別,若要無限上綱,則曾氏之所謂豪花公費,亦應判監十年八載矣Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-72047103701474408742012-06-28T00:52:28.709+08:002012-06-28T00:52:28.709+08:00仲有,梁振英自己找屋宇處找出其餘5處僭建物,那為何還要為咁小的花棚講大話?It doesn'...仲有,梁振英自己找屋宇處找出其餘5處僭建物,那為何還要為咁小的花棚講大話?It doesn't make sense!亂博https://www.blogger.com/profile/16107064923161771003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-9789000934513452202012-06-28T00:18:03.725+08:002012-06-28T00:18:03.725+08:00其實,我吾相信一個人會為那區區花棚而講大話,I wouldn't say he wouldn...其實,我吾相信一個人會為那區區花棚而講大話,I wouldn't say he wouldn't lie at all. But it just doesn't make sense to tell a lie just for such little thing?亂博https://www.blogger.com/profile/16107064923161771003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-24819530784667839342012-06-28T00:07:04.579+08:002012-06-28T00:07:04.579+08:00So? 200呎的僭建物已經拆左。為已經拆左的200呎僭建物出去遊行?因為佢為200呎的僭建花棚講大...So? 200呎的僭建物已經拆左。為已經拆左的200呎僭建物出去遊行?因為佢為200呎的僭建花棚講大話,所以掟佢落台?大佬!無唔無聊D呀!小事化到無限大,民生野又唔見佢地關心下?拉布、流會搞到「一手住宅物業銷售條例」延遲成年實施,俾D地產商走貨呀?土地供應吾夠,等到幾時先至可以增加供應?呢D先至大件事!亂博https://www.blogger.com/profile/16107064923161771003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-47479221398980645552012-06-27T22:52:56.323+08:002012-06-27T22:52:56.323+08:00請看今日明報的衛星圖,買入後的僭建和買入前已有已很清楚請看今日明報的衛星圖,買入後的僭建和買入前已有已很清楚Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-72065049418583799832012-06-27T08:46:21.580+08:002012-06-27T08:46:21.580+08:00在此奉勸各位,如非社民連支持者,最好避免去7.1遊行,好多7.1遊行的人真的不是香港人,7.1巳經成...在此奉勸各位,如非社民連支持者,最好避免去7.1遊行,好多7.1遊行的人真的不是香港人,7.1巳經成為內地自由行的旅遊項目,有否去過海洋公園Halloween?好多內地自由行,成個公園迫到爆,近日內地中山那麼大怨氣.......唉!好恐亂博https://www.blogger.com/profile/16107064923161771003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-79474498391685859062012-06-27T08:37:01.506+08:002012-06-27T08:37:01.506+08:00200呎花棚,借題發揮,有咁大煲到咁大,搞起7.1遊行,多D人去200呎花棚,借題發揮,有咁大煲到咁大,搞起7.1遊行,多D人去亂博https://www.blogger.com/profile/16107064923161771003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-40943480389191691132012-06-26T08:10:34.493+08:002012-06-26T08:10:34.493+08:00認同你對梁氏僭建的觀點,根本梁氏和唐氏的性質各異,梁氏這類已一早建成的大宅,存在多處僭建不奇,若要追...認同你對梁氏僭建的觀點,根本梁氏和唐氏的性質各異,梁氏這類已一早建成的大宅,存在多處僭建不奇,若要追究當應找前業主,梁氏不是稽查僭建專家,不知道有啥希奇,看不到有何誠信問題,無非有人借題發揮,其心可誅Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-6232781182356087512012-06-25T09:26:59.590+08:002012-06-25T09:26:59.590+08:00譁眾取寵、小題大做就是那些泛民的一貫搗亂手段!那些收錢講歪理的律師、大律師更就加不可信!譁眾取寵、小題大做就是那些泛民的一貫搗亂手段!那些收錢講歪理的律師、大律師更就加不可信!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6472492327102302557.post-2801056077827663352012-06-24T07:44:59.504+08:002012-06-24T07:44:59.504+08:00仲有,呢班成日講環保、保育的泛民,有冇諗過梁振英的葡萄樹好無辜?俾佢地迫死!棵樹造過D乜?一棵樹能...仲有,呢班成日講環保、保育的泛民,有冇諗過梁振英的葡萄樹好無辜?俾佢地迫死!棵樹造過D乜?一棵樹能夠成長要幾多年?環保大概只是阻住開發土地的藉口而已,咁愛護植物有冇為佢地著想?唔好迫人迫得咁緊?亂博https://www.blogger.com/profile/16107064923161771003noreply@blogger.com